Your Debugging Playbook
Build your personal debugging playbook — combine the 5-step process, bug patterns, tools, and AI prompts into a reusable system for solving any bug efficiently.
🔄 Recall Bridge: Over the past 7 lessons, you’ve learned the debugging mindset, error message reading, the 5-step process, debugging tools, bug patterns, production debugging, and root cause analysis. Now let’s combine everything into your personal debugging playbook.
A debugging playbook is your systematic approach to any bug — a decision tree built from everything you’ve learned. Instead of starting from scratch each time, you follow a proven process that gets faster with every bug you solve.
Your Complete Debugging Playbook
Phase 1: Triage (2 minutes)
Before investigating, assess the situation:
| Question | Action Based on Answer |
|---|---|
| Is production affected RIGHT NOW? | Yes → symptom fix first, root cause later |
| Can I reproduce it? | No → gather more context (user environment, logs, timing) |
| Have I seen this pattern before? | Yes → jump to the matching bug pattern |
| Is the error message clear? | Yes → follow the error directly to the source |
Phase 2: Investigate (5-30 minutes)
| Step | Action | Tool |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Read the error | Extract type, description, location, data state | Error message anatomy (Lesson 2) |
| 2. Reproduce | Find the exact trigger conditions | Reproduction checklist (Lesson 3) |
| 3. Pattern match | Match symptoms to known bug patterns | Bug pattern library (Lesson 5) |
| 4. Isolate | Binary search to find exact failure point | Binary search debugging (Lesson 3) |
| 5. Identify | Understand WHY the code fails | Debugger or strategic logging (Lesson 4) |
Phase 3: Fix (15-60 minutes)
| Action | Check |
|---|---|
| Write failing test first | Test fails with current code? |
| Fix the root cause | Does the 5 Whys analysis point here? |
| Run the test | Test passes with fix? |
| Run full test suite | Nothing else broke? |
| Add prevention | Monitoring, linting rule, or documentation? |
Bug Pattern Quick Reference
Use this table when you encounter a bug — match the symptoms to find the likely pattern:
| Symptom | Likely Pattern | First Check |
|---|---|---|
| “Cannot read property of null/undefined” | Null reference | Trace backward to find where the value became null |
| Index out of bounds / missing last element | Off-by-one | Check loop boundaries: < vs <=, 0 vs 1 |
| Works locally, fails in production intermittently | Race condition | Check async operation ordering, add Promise.all() |
Returns [object Promise] | Missing await | Find the async call without await |
"5" + 3 = "53" | Type mismatch | Check type coercion, use strict equality === |
| Value changed “mysteriously” | State mutation | Check if objects/arrays are mutated instead of copied |
| Works fine, then breaks after deploy | Regression | Use git bisect to find the breaking commit |
| Fails only with specific input | Edge case | Test empty strings, 0, null, special characters |
AI Debugging Prompts Library
When you’re stuck (general):
I’ve been debugging for [TIME] and I’m stuck. Bug: [DESCRIBE]. What I’ve tried: [LIST]. My assumptions: [LIST]. Challenge my assumptions — which one is most likely wrong? Suggest 3 hypotheses I haven’t considered.
When you need pattern matching:
My bug has these symptoms: [LIST SYMPTOMS]. Which common bug pattern does this match: off-by-one, null reference, race condition, async error, type mismatch, state mutation, stale closure? Explain why and suggest the first thing to check.
When you need root cause analysis:
The immediate cause of my bug is [CAUSE]. Help me do a 5 Whys analysis to find the root cause. After each “why,” suggest what evidence I should look for. Stop when we reach a process or design fix.
When you need a fix reviewed:
Here’s my bug fix: [PASTE DIFF]. The bug was: [DESCRIBE]. Review my fix: (1) Does it address the root cause or just the symptom? (2) Could it break anything else? (3) What test should I write to prevent regression? (4) Is there a simpler fix?
Self-Assessment: Debugging Skills
Rate yourself honestly on each skill (1 = beginner, 5 = confident):
| Skill | Key Question |
|---|---|
| Error message reading | Can I extract type, cause, location, and data state from any error? |
| Systematic reproduction | Can I find exact trigger conditions for intermittent bugs? |
| Binary search debugging | Do I halve the problem space with each test? |
| Bug pattern recognition | Can I match symptoms to common patterns in under 30 seconds? |
| Tool selection | Do I choose the right tool (print, debugger, DevTools) for each situation? |
| Production debugging | Can I diagnose bugs using only logs and error tracking? |
| Root cause analysis | Do I fix root causes or just symptoms? |
Your weakest skill is your best learning opportunity. Focus practice there.
Common Debugging Mistakes
| Mistake | Why It Hurts | Better Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Fixing without reproducing | Can’t verify the fix works | Always reproduce first |
| Changing multiple things at once | Can’t tell which change fixed it | One change per test |
| Assuming “it works on my machine” | Ignoring environment differences | Match the failing environment |
| Skipping the test | Bug returns weeks later | Write the regression test before fixing |
| Stopping at the symptom fix | Bug returns in a different form | Do the 5 Whys to find the root cause |
| Debugging alone for hours | Tunnel vision on wrong hypothesis | After 30 minutes stuck, get a fresh perspective |
| Not documenting what you tried | Repeat failed approaches after a break | Keep a debugging log during investigation |
30-Day Debugging Practice Plan
| Week | Focus | Practice |
|---|---|---|
| Week 1 | Error messages | For every error you see, extract all 5 pieces (type, cause, location, data state, root question) BEFORE googling |
| Week 2 | Systematic process | Use the 5-step process (reproduce → isolate → identify → fix → verify) on every bug, even simple ones |
| Week 3 | Pattern recognition | When you find a bug, name the pattern before fixing it. Keep a log of which patterns you see most |
| Week 4 | Root cause analysis | For every bug fix, ask “why” at least 3 times. Document one root cause analysis fully using the 5 Whys |
Key Takeaways
- Your debugging playbook is a three-phase system: triage (2 minutes — assess severity and check patterns), investigate (5-30 minutes — read error, reproduce, pattern match, isolate, identify), and fix (15-60 minutes — write failing test, fix root cause, verify, add prevention)
- Pattern recognition is the highest-leverage debugging skill: matching symptoms to known bug patterns (null reference, off-by-one, race condition, type mismatch, state mutation) turns 30-minute investigations into 30-second diagnoses — build your pattern library by naming every bug you fix
- The debugging meta-skill is knowing when to change approach: if you’ve been stuck for 30+ minutes, document what you’ve tried, challenge your assumptions (one of them is probably wrong), get fresh perspective from AI or a colleague, and take a break — persistence on the wrong path is not productive debugging
Course Complete
Congratulations — you now have a complete debugging toolkit. From reading error messages to root cause analysis, you can approach any bug systematically. The key is practice: use the playbook on every bug, even small ones, until the process becomes automatic. Happy debugging.
Knowledge Check
Complete the quiz above first
Lesson completed!