Lesson 3 15 min

Data Analysis and Policy Research

Use AI to analyze datasets, summarize policy research, build evidence for decisions, and turn raw numbers into clear insights for stakeholders.

From Data Overload to Data Insight

🔄 Quick Recall: In the previous lesson, you learned to draft government documents using structured prompts. Now you’ll apply that same structured approach to a different challenge: turning raw data and research into actionable intelligence.

Government agencies collect enormous amounts of data — service requests, budget figures, performance metrics, survey responses, demographic information. The problem isn’t having data. It’s having time to analyze it.

Harvard’s Ash Center found that agencies using AI for data analysis reduced report preparation time by 50-70%. That’s not because AI is smarter than your analysts — it’s because AI handles the tedious parts (sorting, summarizing, identifying patterns) so your people can focus on interpretation and recommendations.

The Government Analysis Framework

Government data analysis isn’t just about finding patterns. It’s about answering questions that affect policy, budgets, and people’s lives. Here’s the framework:

Step 1: Define the question — What does the decision-maker need to know?

Step 2: Identify the data — What datasets are relevant, and what’s their classification?

Step 3: Analyze with AI — Use specific, structured prompts (not vague requests)

Step 4: Verify and contextualize — Check AI findings against source data

Step 5: Present for the audience — Council members need different formats than department heads

Quick Check: Why is Step 4 (verify) non-negotiable in government analysis? Because AI can generate confident-sounding statistical claims that are mathematically wrong. A city council making budget decisions based on unverified AI analysis could misallocate public funds.

Analyzing Government Data with AI

Budget and Financial Analysis

Budget season is every government employee’s least favorite time of year. AI can make it less painful:

Analyze this budget data for [department/agency]:

[Paste data or describe the dataset]

Answer these specific questions:
1. Which line items changed more than 10% from last fiscal year?
2. What's the 3-year trend for our top 5 expense categories?
3. Are there any spending patterns that suggest inefficiency (e.g., end-of-year spikes)?
4. How do our per-capita costs compare to [benchmark — similar agencies, state averages]?

Format: Create a briefing table showing: Category | FY24 | FY25 | Change | Flag
Flag any items that need director attention.

Performance Metrics

Every government agency tracks KPIs — response times, case closure rates, citizen satisfaction, processing backlogs:

I'm preparing a quarterly performance report for [department].

Metrics data:
[Paste your metrics — even rough numbers work]

Analyze:
1. Which metrics improved vs. declined this quarter?
2. Are we meeting our published service level targets?
3. What correlations exist (e.g., does staffing affect response times)?
4. Where are the biggest gaps between target and actual performance?

Present findings in a table with green/yellow/red status indicators.
Include a 2-3 sentence narrative summary suitable for a public report.

Policy Research and Comparison

When your agency is considering a new policy, you need to know what’s worked (and failed) elsewhere:

I'm researching how other [states/cities/agencies] handle [policy issue].

What I need:
1. Which states have enacted legislation on [topic] in the last 3 years?
2. What are the main policy approaches (regulatory, incentive-based, voluntary)?
3. What outcomes have been reported?
4. What implementation challenges did agencies encounter?

IMPORTANT: I'll verify all specific citations against official sources.
Flag any information you're uncertain about.
Format as a comparison table with columns: Jurisdiction | Approach | Year Enacted | Key Provisions | Reported Outcomes

Critical warning: AI can and does fabricate policy citations. Use AI-generated policy research as a starting point for your own verification, not as a final source. Check every statute number, agency name, and implementation date against official government websites.

Turning Analysis into Presentations

Government stakeholders — elected officials, department heads, citizen advisory boards — don’t want spreadsheets. They want answers.

The Data Story Format

Turn this analysis into a stakeholder presentation outline:

Data findings: [paste your analysis results]
Audience: [city council / department head / community meeting]
Decision needed: [what action should follow from this data?]
Time limit: [5 min presentation / 1-page handout / full report]

Structure:
1. The headline finding (one sentence)
2. Why it matters for [audience]
3. 3 supporting data points with context
4. What we recommend and why
5. What happens if we do nothing

Use plain language. Define any technical terms. Include source citations.

Visualizing Data for Government

When describing charts or data to AI for presentation materials:

Data TypeBest VisualExample
Trends over timeLine chartCrime rates over 5 years
Comparing categoriesBar chartBudget by department
Parts of a wholePie/donut chartRevenue sources
Geographic patternsHeat mapService requests by district
Before/afterSide-by-side comparisonResponse times pre/post policy change

Quick Check: Why is it risky to present AI-generated policy comparisons without verification? Because AI can fabricate statute numbers, blend details from different policies, and present them with high confidence. In government, citing a non-existent law in an official report damages credibility and can mislead decision-makers.

Working with Sensitive Data

Government datasets often contain information that can’t go into a consumer AI tool. Here’s how to work around that:

Anonymize first: Remove names, addresses, SSNs, and case numbers before any AI analysis. Replace with generic identifiers (Person A, Location 1).

Use aggregate data: Instead of individual records, use summary statistics. “We had 1,247 service requests in Q3, up 15% from Q2” works without exposing any individual’s data.

Approved platforms only: For sensitive analysis, use only AI tools your IT department has authorized. Many agencies now have secure AI environments specifically for this purpose — New York State’s ITS AI Pro is one example.

Ask your data governance team: If you’re not sure whether data can be used with AI, ask. It’s always better to check first than to explain a data breach later.

Key Takeaways

  • Break complex analysis into specific, answerable questions — vague prompts produce vague results
  • AI handles the tedious parts of data analysis (sorting, summarizing, pattern detection) so you can focus on interpretation
  • Always verify AI-generated policy research against official sources — AI fabricates citations
  • Anonymize or aggregate sensitive data before using AI tools
  • Format analysis for your actual audience — council members need headlines, not spreadsheets

Up Next: You’ll learn to use AI for constituent services and case management — handling inquiries, processing requests, and managing the communication that connects government to the people it serves.

Knowledge Check

1. Your supervisor asks you to analyze three years of 311 service request data and present findings to the city council. What's the best AI approach?

2. You need to research how other states handle a policy issue. What's the critical limitation of using AI for this?

3. What makes a government data summary different from a business data summary?

Answer all questions to check

Complete the quiz above first

Related Skills