Underwriting Support
Use AI to prepare underwriting submissions, assess risks, generate comprehensive risk reports, and improve placement success rates with carriers.
Premium Course Content
This lesson is part of a premium course. Upgrade to Pro to unlock all premium courses and content.
- Access all premium courses
- 1000+ AI skill templates included
- New content added weekly
🔄 Quick Recall: In the previous lesson, you built AI systems for policy analysis, gap identification, and carrier comparison. Now you’ll use AI on the other side of the process — preparing submissions that get faster underwriting decisions and better terms.
Underwriting is where insurance decisions are made. AI has compressed standard underwriting from days to minutes — but the quality of the submission still determines the outcome. Clean, comprehensive, well-documented submissions get fast approvals. Incomplete or poorly presented submissions get delays, declinations, or unfavorable terms.
AI helps you prepare submissions that work WITH automated underwriting systems, not against them.
Building AI-Assisted Risk Assessments
A risk assessment is your professional evaluation of the account — presented before the underwriter forms their own opinion. When done well, it frames the narrative.
AI prompt for risk assessment:
You are an insurance risk assessment specialist. Create a comprehensive risk assessment for: [INSURED NAME], [BUSINESS TYPE/PERSONAL PROFILE]. Operations: [DESCRIBE OPERATIONS, REVENUE, EMPLOYEES, LOCATIONS]. Current coverage: [EXISTING POLICIES AND LIMITS]. Known risk factors: [LIST KNOWN RISKS — fire exposure, flood zone, claims history, industry hazards]. For each risk factor, assess: severity (high/medium/low), likelihood, current mitigation measures, and recommended additional controls. Generate a risk score (1-10) for each category and an overall risk profile. Format as a professional document suitable to include with a carrier submission.
Risk assessment framework by line:
| Line | Key Risk Categories | AI Evaluates |
|---|---|---|
| Commercial property | Construction type, occupancy, protection class, fire suppression, flood/wind exposure | Building age vs. maintenance, replacement cost accuracy, business income adequacy |
| General liability | Operations hazard, products/completed operations, contractual exposure | Industry loss data, claim frequency patterns, safety program adequacy |
| Commercial auto | Fleet size, driver records, vehicle types, radius of operations | MVR analysis, fleet age/maintenance, hiring practices |
| Workers’ comp | Classification accuracy, experience mod, safety program, claims management | Mod trend analysis, industry benchmarking, return-to-work program |
| Professional liability | Services provided, contract terms, client types, prior claims | Industry E&O frequency, engagement letter review, risk management practices |
✅ Quick Check: An experience modification rate (EMR) of 1.25 means the business pays 25% more than average for workers’ comp. What should your risk assessment include? (Answer: Explain WHY the mod is elevated — which claims drove it, when they occurred, and what the trend is. If the mod was 1.45 three years ago and has dropped to 1.25, that’s a positive trend story. AI calculates mod trajectory and identifies which claims drop off the experience period next, projecting future mod improvement. Underwriters respond much better to “elevated but improving” with documented safety changes than to an unexplained 1.25.)
Preparing Winning Submissions
The submission package is your first impression with the underwriter. AI helps you assemble comprehensive packages that answer questions before they’re asked.
Complete submission package:
| Component | What to Include | AI Generates |
|---|---|---|
| Cover letter | Summary of the account, why it’s a good fit for this carrier, key highlights | Professional letter referencing carrier appetite and account strengths |
| Application | Fully completed, no blanks, supplemental information attached | Quality check — flags incomplete fields and inconsistencies |
| Loss runs | 5-year history with loss narratives for each claim | Professional loss narratives with root cause and corrective actions |
| Risk assessment | Your professional evaluation of the account | Comprehensive risk profile with mitigation measures |
| Supplemental info | Financials, safety programs, contracts, photos | Organization checklist ensuring nothing is missing |
| Pricing expectations | Target premium range with market comparisons | Market analysis supporting competitive but realistic expectations |
AI prompt for submission cover letter:
Draft a professional underwriting submission cover letter for [CARRIER NAME]. Account: [INSURED NAME], [BUSINESS TYPE], requesting [LINES OF COVERAGE]. Highlights to emphasize: [LIST 3-5 POSITIVE RISK CHARACTERISTICS — years in business, safety record, management experience, loss control measures]. Address this known concern proactively: [ANY RISK FACTOR THE UNDERWRITER WILL QUESTION]. Include: why this account fits the carrier’s appetite, your relationship with the insured, and expected premium range based on market conditions. Professional but concise — under 300 words.
Loss Narrative Writing
Loss narratives can make or break a submission. Raw loss runs tell underwriters what happened. Loss narratives tell them why — and more importantly, what changed.
AI prompt for loss narrative:
Write professional loss narratives for these claims on [INSURED NAME]’s account. For each claim, I’ll provide: date, type, description, total paid, and current status. For each one, create a narrative that: (1) describes what happened factually, (2) identifies the root cause, (3) explains what corrective actions the insured implemented after the loss, and (4) notes any resulting policy/procedure changes. Tone: professional, factual, forward-looking. Avoid minimizing legitimate claims — underwriters appreciate honesty. Claims: [LIST CLAIMS WITH DETAILS].
Loss narrative examples:
| Raw Loss Run Entry | AI-Generated Narrative |
|---|---|
| “03/15/2024 - GL - Slip and fall - $45,000 paid” | “A customer slipped on a wet floor near the entrance during rainy weather. Investigation revealed the floor mat had shifted, exposing the wet tile. Following this incident, the insured installed permanent recessed floor mats at all entrances, added wet floor signage protocol, and implemented twice-daily floor inspection during inclement weather. No similar incidents have occurred since.” |
| “09/22/2023 - WC - Back injury - $28,000 paid” | “A warehouse employee sustained a lower back strain while lifting inventory boxes exceeding the 50-lb solo lift policy. The insured responded by retraining all warehouse staff on proper lifting techniques, installing a team-lift policy for items over 40 lbs, purchasing mechanical lifting equipment, and adding the lifting protocol to new hire orientation. The employee returned to full duty after 6 weeks.” |
✅ Quick Check: Why does a loss narrative that acknowledges the claim honestly work better than one that minimizes it? (Answer: Underwriters read loss runs every day — they can spot minimization immediately, and it erodes trust in the entire submission. An honest narrative that shows the insured learned from the loss and implemented changes signals a well-managed risk. The underwriter thinks: “This account had a problem, fixed it, and is now better managed than accounts that haven’t been tested.” Honesty builds credibility; minimization destroys it.)
Working with Carrier Appetites
Different carriers want different risks. AI helps you match accounts to the right carriers and present submissions in the format each carrier prefers.
AI prompt for carrier matching:
I need to place coverage for [ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION — industry, size, coverage needs, loss history]. Here are the carriers I have appointments with: [LIST CARRIERS WITH THEIR GENERAL APPETITES]. Based on this account’s risk profile, rank the carriers by likely appetite from best fit to worst fit. For each carrier, explain: why this account fits (or doesn’t), any potential concerns the underwriter might raise, and how to position the submission to address those concerns.
Key Takeaways
- Clean, comprehensive submissions get faster decisions — AI underwriting systems score data completeness, so every blank field or missing document adds days to the process
- Proactive risk assessments frame the narrative before the underwriter forms their opinion — present mitigation measures alongside risk factors to demonstrate thorough due diligence
- Loss narratives transform claim history from a liability into a story of risk improvement — AI drafts professional narratives showing root cause analysis and corrective actions
- The submission package (cover letter + application + loss runs + risk assessment + supplementals) is your first impression — AI ensures nothing is missing and everything is professionally presented
- Match accounts to carrier appetite before submitting — a well-targeted submission to the right carrier gets better terms than a shotgun approach to every appointment
Up Next
In the next lesson, you’ll build AI-assisted claims processing systems — faster document handling, communication templates, and tracking workflows that improve resolution times and client satisfaction.
Knowledge Check
Complete the quiz above first
Lesson completed!