Finding Your First Project
Learn how to find open source projects that match your skills and interests — from evaluating project health to identifying beginner-friendly issues with AI assistance.
🔄 Recall Bridge: In the previous lesson, you learned why open source accelerates your career and how AI removes barriers for new contributors. Now let’s find the right project for your first contribution.
Finding the right project is the difference between a rewarding first contribution and giving up in frustration. The goal isn’t finding the “best” project — it’s finding one that matches your skills, interests, and available time, with maintainers who welcome newcomers.
Strategy 1: Contribute to Tools You Already Use
The easiest path is contributing to software you already know as a user:
AI prompt for finding contribution opportunities:
I regularly use these tools/libraries: [LIST YOUR TOOLS]. Check their GitHub repositories for: (1) Open issues labeled ‘good first issue’, ‘help wanted’, or ‘beginner’, (2) Documentation that could be improved, (3) Missing test cases, (4) Outdated dependencies. Which of these projects has the most beginner-friendly contribution opportunities?
Why this works: You already understand the use cases, can reproduce bugs, and know what good documentation should say. You’re contributing as a user who happens to code, not a stranger trying to understand the project from scratch.
Strategy 2: Use Discovery Platforms
Several platforms aggregate beginner-friendly issues across thousands of projects:
| Platform | What It Does | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub “good first issue” search | Search all GitHub issues by label | Finding issues in your language |
| Up-for-grabs.net | Curates projects wanting new contributors | Browsing by technology |
| CodeTriage | Sends open issues to your inbox daily | Passive discovery over time |
| firstcontributions | Practice repository for first-time PRs | Learning the PR workflow itself |
| First Timers Only | Issues reserved for absolute beginners | Your very first contribution |
AI prompt for filtering results:
I found these 10 open issues on Up-for-grabs.net: [PASTE TITLES AND LINKS]. I know [YOUR LANGUAGE] at a [BEGINNER/INTERMEDIATE/ADVANCED] level. Rank these by: (1) How achievable they are for my skill level, (2) How recently the project was updated, (3) How responsive the maintainers are. Tell me which 2-3 I should focus on and why.
Strategy 3: Search GitHub Directly
GitHub search query for beginners:
label:"good first issue" language:python is:open sort:updated
Replace python with your language. Add stars:100..5000 to filter for medium-sized projects (large enough to matter, small enough to be welcoming).
Evaluating Project Health
Before investing time, check these five indicators:
| Indicator | Healthy | Warning Sign |
|---|---|---|
| Last commit | Within 1-2 weeks | Months ago |
| Issue response time | Days | Weeks or never |
| PR merge rate | PRs being merged regularly | Many open, unreviewed PRs |
| CONTRIBUTING.md | Exists with clear instructions | Missing or outdated |
| Community tone | Welcoming, constructive feedback | Harsh, dismissive, or silent |
AI prompt for project evaluation:
Evaluate this GitHub repository for beginner-friendliness: [REPO URL]. Check: (1) When was the last commit? (2) How quickly do maintainers respond to issues? (3) Are PRs being reviewed and merged? (4) Is there a CONTRIBUTING.md? (5) What’s the tone in issue comments — welcoming or hostile? Give me a 1-5 score and your recommendation: contribute or skip.
Reading CONTRIBUTING.md
Every healthy project has a CONTRIBUTING.md file (or a section in the README). Before writing any code, read it completely.
AI prompt to summarize contribution rules:
Here’s the CONTRIBUTING.md for [PROJECT NAME]: [PASTE CONTENT]. Summarize: (1) What’s the workflow for submitting changes? (2) Are there branch naming conventions? (3) What tests do I need to run? (4) Is there a code style guide? (5) Do I need to sign a CLA (Contributor License Agreement)? (6) Anything unusual I should know?
Common contribution requirements:
| Requirement | Example | Why It Exists |
|---|---|---|
| Issue before PR | “Open an issue first to discuss” | Prevents wasted work on unwanted changes |
| Branch naming | fix/issue-123-typo | Keeps branches organized |
| Commit format | feat: add validation for email | Automated changelog generation |
| Tests required | “All PRs must include tests” | Prevents regressions |
| CLA signature | Click-through agreement | Legal protection for the project |
✅ Quick Check: You found a project with 2,000 stars, commits from yesterday, and issues responded to within 24 hours. But there’s no CONTRIBUTING.md. Is this still a good choice? (Answer: Yes — many healthy projects don’t have formal CONTRIBUTING.md files. Check the README for contribution instructions instead. If neither exists, look at recent merged PRs to reverse-engineer the expected workflow. The project health indicators — recent commits and responsive maintainers — are more important than formal documentation.)
Key Takeaways
- The best first project is one you already use as a developer — you understand the context, can reproduce bugs, and know what good documentation should say, which gives you a natural advantage over contributing to unfamiliar projects
- Project health matters more than popularity: check last commit date, issue response time, PR merge rate, and community tone — a 500-star project with active maintainers is far better than a 50K-star abandoned one
- Always read CONTRIBUTING.md before writing code — five minutes understanding the project’s workflow, branch naming, commit format, and testing requirements prevents hours of revision and the #1 reason first contributions get rejected
Up Next
In the next lesson, you’ll learn how to understand an unfamiliar codebase quickly using AI — navigating architecture, reading patterns, and finding exactly where to make your change.
Knowledge Check
Complete the quiz above first
Lesson completed!