Monitoring and Incident Response
Use AI for real-time threat detection, log analysis, automated incident response, and root cause analysis in production environments.
Premium Course Content
This lesson is part of a premium course. Upgrade to Pro to unlock all premium courses and content.
- Access all premium courses
- 1000+ AI skill templates included
- New content added weekly
The average time to identify a breach is 204 days. With AI, it’s measured in minutes. The difference is between an attacker having 7 months of free access and having 7 minutes.
🔄 Quick Recall: In the previous lesson, you built secure CI/CD pipelines with automated security gates. Monitoring is the production layer — detecting threats that made it past your preventive controls.
AI-Powered Log Analysis
Investigating Suspicious Activity
Analyze these application logs for security concerns:
[Paste relevant log entries]
Context:
- Application: REST API (FastAPI)
- Normal traffic: 1,000 requests/hour
- Authentication: JWT tokens
- Infrastructure: Kubernetes on AWS
Look for:
1. Authentication anomalies (brute force, credential stuffing)
2. Authorization violations (accessing resources without permission)
3. Injection attempts (SQL, XSS, command injection in parameters)
4. Data exfiltration patterns (unusually large responses, bulk queries)
5. Infrastructure probing (scanning, enumeration attempts)
For each finding:
- What was detected and the specific log entries
- Severity assessment
- Recommended immediate action
- Recommended investigation steps
Correlating Events Across Services
I have logs from three services during a suspicious event
window (14:00-14:30 UTC):
API Gateway logs: [paste sample]
Auth Service logs: [paste sample]
Database audit logs: [paste sample]
Correlate events across these services:
1. Build a timeline of what happened
2. Identify the initial entry point
3. Trace the attack path across services
4. Determine what data may have been accessed
5. Identify the point where detection should have triggered
✅ Quick Check: Your SIEM shows 50,000 events per day. A human analyst can review about 200 events per day. Without AI, what percentage of events are reviewed? (Answer: 0.4%. That means 99.6% of your security events go unexamined. AI doesn’t review them all either — but it correlates, filters, and prioritizes so the 200 events your analyst reviews are the 200 most likely to be real threats, not a random sample. This is why AI monitoring finds threats that manual review misses.)
Incident Response Playbooks
Generating a Playbook
Generate an incident response playbook for:
Incident type: Suspected data breach via exposed API endpoint
Environment: Production Kubernetes cluster (AWS EKS)
Data sensitivity: PII (names, emails, phone numbers)
Playbook sections:
1. DETECTION — What triggered this playbook? What alerts/signals?
2. TRIAGE (first 15 minutes)
- Severity classification criteria
- Initial containment actions
- Who to notify (on-call, security lead, management)
3. CONTAINMENT (15-60 minutes)
- Network isolation steps
- Credential rotation procedures
- Evidence preservation
4. INVESTIGATION (1-4 hours)
- Log analysis checklist
- Scope determination
- Data impact assessment
5. REMEDIATION
- Root cause fix
- Security control improvements
- Monitoring enhancements
6. RECOVERY
- Service restoration steps
- Verification checks
7. POST-INCIDENT
- Postmortem template
- Regulatory notification requirements (GDPR, CCPA)
- Customer communication draft
Include specific AWS CLI commands and kubectl commands
for each step.
Automated Response Rules
Design automated incident response rules for our environment:
Trigger conditions and automatic actions:
1. Brute force detected (>100 failed auths in 5 min from one IP)
→ Auto: Rate limit IP, alert on-call
2. Suspicious API pattern (>10 requests to /admin from non-admin user)
→ Auto: Block session, alert security team
3. Data exfiltration pattern (response body >10MB in bulk queries)
→ Auto: Log detailed request info, alert on-call
4. Container escape attempt (unexpected process in container)
→ Auto: Kill pod, preserve logs, alert security team
For each rule, generate:
- Detection logic (Prometheus/alerting rule or SIEM query)
- Automated response action
- Escalation criteria (when does auto-response trigger human review?)
AI Monitoring Tools
| Tool | Focus | AI Feature |
|---|---|---|
| Dynatrace (Davis AI) | Full-stack observability | Automated root cause analysis |
| CrowdStrike Falcon | Endpoint + cloud detection | AI threat hunting, behavioral analysis |
| Azure Monitor | Cloud infrastructure | Narrative summaries of anomalies |
| Datadog | Infrastructure + APM | AI-powered anomaly detection |
| Lacework | Cloud security | Behavioral anomaly detection |
Postmortem Generation
Generate an incident postmortem report:
Incident: Unauthorized access to customer database
Date: [date]
Duration: Detected at 14:15 UTC, contained at 14:45 UTC
Impact: ~500 customer records potentially accessed
Timeline:
[paste chronological events]
Generate a blameless postmortem with:
1. Executive summary (3 sentences)
2. Timeline of events
3. Root cause analysis (Five Whys)
4. Contributing factors
5. What went well (detection and response positives)
6. What needs improvement
7. Action items with owners and deadlines
Practice Exercise
- Take a set of application logs and ask AI to identify security anomalies
- Generate an incident response playbook for your most likely threat scenario
- Write an automated response rule for one threat pattern in your environment
Key Takeaways
- AI compresses incident timelines: seconds to detect, minutes to triage, automated initial response
- Log analysis at scale requires AI — humans can review 0.4% of daily events; AI prioritizes the rest
- Automated playbooks ensure consistent response regardless of who’s on-call
- Proportionate response (rate limit vs. block) prevents collateral damage from false positives
- Blameless postmortems with Five Whys analysis identify systemic failures, not just immediate causes
Up Next
In the next lesson, you’ll learn compliance and governance automation — turning audit nightmares into continuous compliance with AI-generated evidence.
Knowledge Check
Complete the quiz above first
Lesson completed!