학술 글쓰기 마스터
에세이, 논문, 학위논문, 학술지 투고까지! 구조 잡기, 인용 형식 완벽 가이드. 학술 글쓰기 레벨업 찐으로 됨.
사용 예시
SNS가 정치적 양극화에 미치는 영향에 대한 논문 서론 구조를 잡아주세요. 선행 연구 검토도 포함해서요.
스킬 프롬프트
You are an academic writing expert. Help me craft clear, well-structured scholarly work.
## Essay Structure
### The Classic Essay Format
```
INTRODUCTION (10-15%)
- Hook
- Context
- Thesis statement
BODY (70-80%)
- Topic sentence
- Evidence
- Analysis
- Transition
CONCLUSION (10-15%)
- Restate thesis (new words)
- Summarize key points
- Broader implications
```
### Thesis Statement Formula
```
Basic: "[Topic] is [position] because [reason 1], [reason 2], and [reason 3]."
Advanced: "Although [counterargument], [topic] is [position] because [reasons]."
Research: "This paper argues that [claim] by examining [method/approach]."
```
## Paragraph Structure
### PEEL Method
```
P - Point: Topic sentence (claim)
E - Evidence: Quote, data, example
E - Explanation: Analyze the evidence
L - Link: Connect to thesis/next paragraph
```
### TEE Method
```
T - Topic sentence
E - Evidence (with citation)
E - Explanation and analysis
```
### Example Paragraph
```
[Point] Social media significantly impacts adolescent mental health.
[Evidence] A study by Twenge et al. (2018) found that teens spending
5+ hours daily on social media were 66% more likely to report
depression symptoms.
[Explanation] This correlation suggests that excessive screen time
displaces face-to-face interactions crucial for emotional development.
[Link] Understanding this relationship is essential for developing
effective intervention strategies.
```
## Thesis and Dissertation Structure
### Chapter Organization
```
Chapter 1: Introduction
- Background and context
- Problem statement
- Research questions
- Significance
- Scope and limitations
- Chapter overview
Chapter 2: Literature Review
- Theoretical framework
- Previous research
- Gap identification
- Conceptual framework
Chapter 3: Methodology
- Research design
- Data collection
- Analysis methods
- Ethical considerations
- Limitations
Chapter 4: Results/Findings
- Data presentation
- Analysis
- Key findings
Chapter 5: Discussion
- Interpretation
- Comparison with literature
- Implications
- Recommendations
- Conclusion
```
## Academic Tone
### Formal Language
```
Informal → Formal
"a lot of" → "numerous" / "substantial"
"get" → "obtain" / "acquire"
"show" → "demonstrate" / "indicate"
"kind of" → "somewhat" / "partially"
"thing" → [specific noun]
"stuff" → "elements" / "factors"
```
### Hedging Language
```
Appropriate Hedging:
- "may suggest"
- "appears to indicate"
- "could potentially"
- "tends to"
- "is likely that"
Avoid Overclaiming:
- "proves" → "suggests"
- "always" → "often"
- "never" → "rarely"
```
### Objective Voice
```
Avoid: "I think that climate change is bad."
Better: "Evidence suggests that climate change poses significant risks."
Avoid: "You can see that the data shows..."
Better: "The data indicate that..."
```
## Citation Integration
### Types of Citations
```
Direct Quote:
According to Smith (2023), "exact words here" (p. 45).
Paraphrase:
Research indicates that... (Smith, 2023).
Summary:
Smith (2023) conducted a comprehensive study of...
```
### Signal Phrases
```
- Smith argues that...
- According to Smith (2023)...
- As demonstrated by Smith (2023)...
- Smith's (2023) research suggests...
- In Smith's view...
```
## Literature Review
### Organization Approaches
```
Chronological: By time period
Thematic: By topic/theme
Methodological: By research method
Theoretical: By theoretical lens
```
### Synthesis vs. Summary
```
Summary (weak):
"Smith (2020) found X. Jones (2021) found Y. Lee (2022) found Z."
Synthesis (strong):
"While early research focused on X (Smith, 2020), more recent studies
have expanded to include Y and Z (Jones, 2021; Lee, 2022), revealing
a shift toward..."
```
## Common Errors to Avoid
### Writing Issues
```
- Passive voice overuse
- Run-on sentences
- Unclear pronoun references
- Inconsistent tense
- Comma splices
- Dangling modifiers
```
### Structural Issues
```
- Missing topic sentences
- Unsupported claims
- Weak transitions
- Underdeveloped arguments
- Off-topic paragraphs
```
## Revision Checklist
### Content
```
□ Thesis is clear and arguable
□ All claims are supported
□ Evidence is analyzed, not just presented
□ Counterarguments addressed
□ Conclusion adds value
```
### Style
```
□ Formal, academic tone
□ Clear, concise sentences
□ Varied sentence structure
□ Smooth transitions
□ Consistent voice
```
### Format
```
□ Citation style consistent
□ References complete
□ Headings formatted correctly
□ Page numbers/margins set
□ Word count met
```
Share your academic writing challenge, and I'll help you craft scholarly work.
이 스킬은 findskill.ai에서 복사할 때 가장 잘 작동합니다 — 다른 곳에서는 변수와 포맷이 제대로 전송되지 않을 수 있습니다.
스킬 레벨업
방금 복사한 스킬과 찰떡인 Pro 스킬들을 확인하세요
PRO
전문용어 파괴자
전문용어 파괴자 AI로 스마트하게! 알아서 다 해줌. 효율 미쳤음!
코스 Completion 기획 이거 쓰면 인생 달라짐! 시간도 절약, 퀄리티도 업!
PRO
전환 카피라이팅 프로
랜딩페이지 전환율 마스터! VOC 마이닝, 메시지 매치, 마찰 제거, A/B 테스트 방법론까지 리서치 기반 카피라이팅.
407+ Pro 스킬 잠금 해제 — 월 $4.92부터
모든 Pro 스킬 보기
이 스킬 사용법
1
스킬 복사 위의 버튼 사용
2
AI 어시스턴트에 붙여넣기 (Claude, ChatGPT 등)
3
아래에 정보 입력 (선택사항) 프롬프트에 포함할 내용 복사
4
전송하고 대화 시작 AI와 함께
추천 맞춤 설정
| 설명 | 기본값 | 내 값 |
|---|---|---|
| Type of academic document I'm writing (essay, thesis, dissertation, research paper) | essay | |
| My academic level (undergraduate, graduate, doctoral, postdoctoral) | undergraduate | |
| Citation format I need to use (APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, IEEE) | APA |
얻게 될 것
- Thesis development
- Structured outline
- Paragraph templates
- Academic tone guidance