Per-user pricing is a trap.
It sounds reasonable at first. “$10 per user per month” feels manageable when you’re a team of three. Then you hire. And hire again. And suddenly that “affordable tool” costs more than your office space.
Meeting software is the worst offender.
Let me show you the math nobody does until it’s too late.
The Deceptive Price Tag
Here’s how meeting tools advertise their pricing:
- Otter.ai Pro: $16.99/user/month
- Fireflies.ai Pro: $18/user/month
- Fathom Standard: $19/user/month
- Fellow Pro: $9/user/month
- Grain: $19/user/month
Seems reasonable for productivity software, right?
Now watch what happens at scale.
The Real Cost at Scale
| Team Size | Otter.ai | Fireflies | Fathom | Fellow |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 people | $85/mo | $90/mo | $95/mo | $45/mo |
| 10 people | $170/mo | $180/mo | $190/mo | $90/mo |
| 25 people | $425/mo | $450/mo | $475/mo | $225/mo |
| 50 people | $850/mo | $900/mo | $950/mo | $450/mo |
| 100 people | $1,700/mo | $1,800/mo | $1,900/mo | $900/mo |
That 50-person team paying for Fireflies? $10,800/year on meeting notes.
A 100-person company? $21,600/year.
For software that summarizes conversations.
What You’re Actually Paying For
Let’s be honest about what these tools do:
- Record the meeting — Your video platform already does this
- Transcribe the audio — Free in Zoom, Meet, and Teams
- Summarize the transcript — A prompt
- Extract action items — A prompt
- Store everything searchable — Google Drive does this free
Points 3 and 4 are the “AI magic.” And they’re prompts. The same prompts you could run yourself.
You’re paying $10-20 per person monthly for automated prompts.
The Alternative: Skills That Scale Free
Here’s the dirty secret the meeting software companies don’t want you to know: the AI summarization they provide is identical to what you get from ChatGPT or Claude with the right prompt.
And unlike per-user software, prompts don’t multiply when your team grows.
Cost to summarize meetings for 5 people: $0 Cost to summarize meetings for 100 people: $0
The prompt works the same either way.
A Real Comparison
Let’s map specific features to free alternatives:
| Paid Feature | What It Actually Is | Free Alternative |
|---|---|---|
| AI Summaries | Summarization prompt | Executive Meeting Brief |
| Action Items | Extraction prompt | Meeting to Slack Digest |
| Team Notifications | Summary + integration | Slack digest skill + copy/paste |
| Meeting Analytics | Parsing prompt | Meeting Effectiveness Scorer |
| Sentiment Analysis | Tone detection prompt | Meeting Sentiment Analyzer |
| Transcript Cleanup | Editing prompt | Meeting Transcript Fixer |
| Recurring Insights | Multi-doc analysis | Cross-Meeting Pattern Finder |
Every “feature” is a prompt in a polished interface.
The Economics at Each Stage
Startup (5 people):
- Otter.ai Pro: $85/month = $1,020/year
- Free skills: $0/year
- Savings: $1,020
Growing team (25 people):
- Otter.ai Pro: $425/month = $5,100/year
- Free skills: $0/year
- Savings: $5,100
Mid-size company (100 people):
- Otter.ai Pro: $1,700/month = $20,400/year
- Free skills: $0/year
- Savings: $20,400
The savings compound. The per-user model doesn’t scale. Free skills do.
“But What About the Time Savings?”
The main argument for paying: “It’s automated. Time is money.”
Fair point. Let’s do that math.
Time to manually process a meeting with skills:
- Get transcript from Zoom: 30 seconds
- Open ChatGPT/Claude: 10 seconds
- Paste transcript + skill: 30 seconds
- Copy output to Slack/doc: 20 seconds
- Total: ~90 seconds per meeting
Time saved by automation: ~90 seconds
Now: is 90 seconds worth $20/person/month?
At a 50-person company with 10 meetings/week each, you’re paying $12,000/year to save 75 hours of copy/paste time.
That’s $160/hour for the privilege of not copying and pasting.
Most companies wouldn’t approve that rate for actual work.
When Paid Tools Actually Make Sense
There are legitimate cases for meeting software subscriptions:
Compliance requirements: Some industries need certified recording, specific retention policies, or audit trails that consumer tools can’t provide.
Mega-scale operations: If you’re processing thousands of meetings daily with automated workflows, integration costs might justify the subscription.
Non-technical teams: If your team refuses to touch AI assistants, a polished UI with auto-transcription reduces friction.
But for typical teams doing typical meetings? The math doesn’t work.
The Migration Path
If you’re currently paying for meeting software, here’s how to switch:
Week 1: Parallel run Keep your current tool active. After each meeting, also run the free skill version. Compare outputs.
Week 2: Spot check Reduce to spot-checking every third meeting. Note any quality differences.
Week 3: Evaluate Review: Is the paid version genuinely better? Or just more automatic?
Week 4: Decide If quality matches, cancel the subscription. Keep the $2,000-20,000/year.
The Skills You Need
Replace your meeting software with these free alternatives:
For basic summaries and action items:
For transcript quality:
For formal documentation:
For analytics and insights:
- Meeting Sentiment Analyzer
- Meeting Cost Calculator
- Meeting Effectiveness Scorer
- Cross-Meeting Pattern Finder
All free. Works with any AI. No per-user pricing.
The Bigger Pattern
Meeting software isn’t unique. Per-user pricing is everywhere:
- Design tools: $15-60/user/month
- Project management: $10-30/user/month
- Communication tools: $8-25/user/month
- AI writing assistants: $20-50/user/month
Every one of these categories has free AI skill alternatives. Not for everything — some tools have genuine value. But for the “AI-powered” features? Often replaceable.
Ask yourself: “Am I paying for infrastructure, or am I paying for prompts?”
If it’s prompts, there’s probably a free skill that does the same thing.
Take Action
- Calculate your current spend — Check how much your team pays monthly for meeting tools
- Try the free alternative — Run Meeting to Slack Digest on your next meeting
- Compare outputs — Is the paid version actually better?
- Decide with data — Not assumptions about what tools “should” cost
The per-user model counts on you not doing this math.
Now you have.
Want to start saving? Browse our meeting skills collection or check Otter.ai alternatives for a detailed comparison.