I needed to research a niche topic last month. Market size for a specific B2B software category. Not mainstream, not something these AI tools were trained on.
So I tested all three: Perplexity, ChatGPT Deep Research, and Gemini Deep Research.
The results were… interesting.
The Quick Answer
If you just want to know which one to use:
Perplexity — Best for most research. Fastest, clearest citations, most trustworthy sources.
ChatGPT Deep Research — Best for comprehensive analysis. Longest reports, deepest synthesis, but slowest and limited access.
Gemini Deep Research — Best for Google ecosystem users. Great multimodal capabilities, massive context window.
Now let me show you why.
How I Tested Them
Same prompt to all three:
“Research the current state of the AI code review tools market. Include market size, major players, growth trends, and recent developments. Cite your sources.”
I evaluated on:
- Source quality (are they citing real, reputable sources?)
- Citation accuracy (do the citations actually say what the AI claims?)
- Comprehensiveness (did it cover all the angles?)
- Speed (how long did it take?)
- Structure (is the output usable?)
Perplexity: The Research Specialist
Perplexity is built as a research tool first. It’s designed for people who need to verify facts, compare sources, and stay current.
What I got:
- 8 sources cited, all clickable
- 4 were primary sources (company reports, analyst firms)
- Took about 45 seconds
- Clear structure with headers and bullet points
What I liked:
- Every claim had an inline citation. I could check immediately.
- Sources were recent (within last 6 months)
- Admitted when data was limited or uncertain
- Free tier is genuinely useful
What I didn’t like:
- Sometimes surface-level. Great starting point, but you’ll want to go deeper.
- Can miss industry-specific sources that aren’t well-indexed
In a systematic evaluation, Perplexity scored highest for content structure: Perplexity (5 points) > Gemini (4 points) > ChatGPT (3 points).
ChatGPT Deep Research: The Comprehensive Analyst
ChatGPT’s Deep Research mode is an agentic feature—it doesn’t just search, it plans a research strategy, executes multiple searches, and synthesizes findings.
What I got:
- 23 pages of output, including 21 pages of content and 2 pages of references
- Extremely detailed analysis
- Took about 8-10 minutes
- Organized into executive summary, main findings, and appendices
What I liked:
- Depth was impressive. It found niche reports I wouldn’t have found on my own.
- Synthesis was excellent—connected dots across sources
- Included competitive analysis, pricing comparisons, and market forecasts
- Best for when you need a complete picture
What I didn’t like:
- Slow. Really slow compared to Perplexity.
- Limited access—Plus users get 30 deep searches per month
- Citations were harder to verify (no inline links, references at the end)
- Sometimes hallucinated minor details
Best use: When you need to write a comprehensive report and have time to wait.
Gemini Deep Research: The Google Powerhouse
Gemini’s strength is integration with Google’s ecosystem and its massive 2 million token context window.
What I got:
- Solid 10-page report
- Mix of Google Search results and academic sources
- Took about 3-4 minutes
- Good integration of charts and visual data
What I liked:
- Access to Google’s search index means recent information
- Great at finding case studies and practical examples
- 2M token context lets you upload entire documents for analysis
- Strong multimodal capabilities (can analyze images, charts)
What I didn’t like:
- Citation format is inconsistent
- Sometimes pulls from low-quality sources without distinguishing them
- The Google integration is great if you use Google Workspace, less useful otherwise
In one comparison test, Gemini emerged victorious for providing the most comprehensive and accurate information—but it also took the longest to respond.
Speed Comparison
This matters when you’re on deadline:
| Tool | Time for Research Query |
|---|---|
| Perplexity | 30-60 seconds |
| Gemini Deep Research | 3-5 minutes |
| ChatGPT Deep Research | 8-15 minutes |
Perplexity and Gemini generate reports much faster. The time difference appears proportional to output length—ChatGPT produces more, but takes longer.
Citation Quality
This is where Perplexity really shines.
Perplexity: Every claim is linked. Click and verify. Easy.
ChatGPT: References at the end. You have to manually check if the source actually says what ChatGPT claims. Often it does, but not always.
Gemini: Mixed. Some inline citations, some references at the end. Quality varies—sometimes pulls from forums or outdated pages.
If you’re writing something that needs to be accurate—academic paper, client report, legal document—Perplexity’s citation transparency is invaluable.
When to Use Each
Use Perplexity When:
- You need quick, verified facts
- Citation quality matters
- You’re doing initial research and want a starting point
- You need current information (last few months)
- You’re a student, journalist, or anyone who needs to verify sources
Use ChatGPT Deep Research When:
- You need comprehensive analysis (not just facts)
- You have time to wait
- You’re writing a long report or whitepaper
- You need synthesis across multiple domains
- You want AI to “think” about the research, not just find it
Use Gemini Deep Research When:
- You’re in Google’s ecosystem (Docs, Drive, etc.)
- You need to analyze uploaded documents
- You want multimodal research (images, charts, PDFs)
- You need very recent information
- You’re doing research that benefits from technology application cases
The Multi-Tool Approach
Here’s what I actually do now:
Start with Perplexity — Get the lay of the land. What are the key facts? Who are the major players? What’s the current state?
Go deep with ChatGPT — If I need comprehensive analysis, I’ll use ChatGPT Deep Research for a thorough dive.
Verify with primary sources — AI is a starting point, not the final word. Always check the original sources.
Use Gemini for specifics — If I need to analyze specific documents or want Google’s search strength on a particular topic.
A multi-tool approach is recommended after understanding the capabilities of different models. Leverage GPT for complex synthesis, Gemini for multimodal analysis, and Perplexity for verified, up-to-date facts.
Pricing for Research
| Tool | Free Tier | Pro Tier |
|---|---|---|
| Perplexity | 5 Pro searches/day | $20/month (unlimited) |
| ChatGPT | Limited access | $20/month (30 deep searches) |
| Gemini | Good free tier | $20/month (unlimited) |
For pure research value, Perplexity Pro is probably the best $20 you can spend. Unlimited searches, no waiting, excellent citation quality.
The Honest Assessment
Perplexity is what Google search should have become. It answers questions with sources, not with ads and SEO spam.
ChatGPT Deep Research is like having a research analyst on staff. Great for comprehensive work, but slow and limited.
Gemini is powerful but inconsistent. Great when it works, frustrating when it pulls from questionable sources.
If I could only pick one for research: Perplexity.
If I had to do serious analytical work: ChatGPT Deep Research.
If I’m already in Google’s world: Gemini.
Prompts for Better Research
These work across all three tools:
For market research:
“Research [TOPIC]. Include market size, major players, growth trends (2020-2026), and recent developments. Cite sources with publication dates. Note any conflicting data.”
For competitive analysis:
“Compare [COMPANY A] vs [COMPANY B] vs [COMPANY C]. Include: products, pricing, market position, recent announcements. Use only sources from the last 12 months.”
For literature review:
“Find academic research on [TOPIC]. Summarize key findings, note methodologies, identify gaps in current research. Prioritize peer-reviewed sources.”
Ready to level up your research? Explore our AI research skills designed to work with any AI tool.
Sources: